David Parsons's Uneven Mix of Athleticism, Artistry


The Washington Post

By Sarah Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 24, 2001; Page C05

First impressions are so important. When the Kennedy Center opened in 1971, its first dance performance was given by the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater, a groundbreaking company at the height of its powers. Friday, as the first production of its first full season, the Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center at the University of Maryland presented the Parsons Dance Company, the modern dance group headed by the highly sought-after choreographer David Parsons.

This was quite a coup, but the choice also marks the Smith Center as emphasizing crowd-pleasing popularity over a creative initiative with lasting interest. The center is not alone in making this choice. Parsons's name is favored by dance organizations looking to corral that ever-elusive younger audience. Recently, even American Ballet Theatre tried baiting its hook with the Parsons lure when it commissioned him to create "The Pied Piper," an expensive, multimedia children's ballet. It flopped.

The problem is not that Parsons is a bad choreographer -- he understands the craft and can be visually clever. But he seems to be short on ideas. He is, perhaps, overworked and overstretched. His recent pieces -- he unveiled a premiere at the Kennedy Center last fall and another at the Smith Center this weekend -- have not matched the promise of his earlier works.

Yet if he's tired, his company still looks energized and youthful and continues to circulate studio shots of its dancers captured in midair, jauntily defying gravity. Call it truth in advertising. What you see is what you get -- a momentary kinetic charge. When they hit the floor, however, they are simply not that interesting. This is the principle at work in "Caught," which continues to be Parsons's most successful work. Elizabeth Koeppen was both supple and explosive in this solo, timing her jumps to a strobe so that the light captured her in what looked like extended flight above the stage. It is the perfect expression of Parsons's talent, and like the Ailey company's reliance on "Revelations," it is part of nearly every program. In the Smith Center's relatively intimate Ina and Jack Kay Theatre, a too-harsh light obscured some of Koeppen's efforts.

By contrast, "Annuals," the Smith Center-commissioned world premiere, was decidedly dark -- in its shadowy lighting and somber black costumes, and in its murky concept. Parsons has explained that this piece refers to the occasions (birthdays, anniversaries and such) that mark time passing. To this end, a dancer periodically walks onstage carrying a candlelit cake as the others are romancing each other or breaking off into anguished introspection. Whatever their grievances, they failed to express anything universally meaningful. John Mackey's jazz-inspired music, which he conducted, was this work's brightest note.

You could appreciate the craft involved in "Sleep Study," a carefully balanced, witty symphony of shifting, curling up and adjusting among the pajama-clad dancers stretched out on the floor. But "Closure" and "Union" were as self-consciously somber as the Brazilian-inspired "Nascimento" was bright. "Nascimento" showed the dancers at their high-spirited best, each jump carefully sculpted in the air, limbs flying. It's like stop-action photography come to life.

However artistically uneven this concert was, Parsons's work was tinged with an added poignancy. His group was scheduled to perform on an outdoor stage at the World Trade Center the day the towers were destroyed. In fact, members of his technical crew were headed to the Twin Towers for a 9 a.m. rehearsal when their van got stuck in traffic, narrowly avoiding the deadly terrorist attacks. "Nascimento" and "Closure" would have been on that program, as well as a piece titled, coincidentally, "Rush Hour."

© 2001 The Washington Post Company

Back to the Annuals page
Back to the Press page